• The Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Back Issues
    • Features
      • Brewing
      • People
      • Culture
      • History
      • Food
      • Travel
      • Styles
      • Homebrewing
    • Departments
      • Coming Soon
      • Columns
        • Visiting the Pub
        • Behind the Bar
        • It’s My Round
        • The Beer Enthusiast
        • The Beer Curmudgeon
        • In The Brewhouse
        • Michael Jackson
        • The Taster
        • Beyond Beer
        • Your Next Beer
        • Industry Insights
      • What’s Brewing
      • Pull Up A Stool
      • Travel
        • Beer Travelers
        • A Closer Look
        • Beer Weekend
      • Stylistically Speaking
      • Home Brewing
      • Beer Talk
      • Beer Books
  • Events
    • World Beer Festival Raleigh – July 7, 2018
    • World Beer Festival Durham – Oct. 6, 2018
    • World Beer Festival Columbia – Feb. 17, 2018
    • Event Calendar
    • Brewery Tastings & Events
    • Beer Explorer
  • Reviews
    • Staff Reviews
    • Beer Talk
    • Flights
    • Book Reviews
  • Learn
    • What is Beer?
      • Water
      • Malt
      • Hops
      • Yeast
    • Styles
      • Lagers
      • British and North American Ales
      • Belgian and Continental Ales
      • Wheat Ales
      • Stouts and Porters
      • Seasonal and Specialty
    • Glossary
  • News
    • New on the Shelves
  • Web Only
    • Blogs
      • Daniel Bradford
      • John Holl
      • Acitelli on History
      • The Beer Bible Blog
      • Bryson
    • Video
    • Photos
    • Podcasts
Menu
logo
  • Advertise with Us
  • Subscriber Services
  • Retailer Services
Give a Gift Subscribe

The New York City ‘Beer War’ of the Mid-1980s

All About Beer Magazine - Volume , Issue
February 19, 2015
Tom Acitelli

In the fall of 1984, Richard Wrigley, a British transplant from Manchester who once likened Michelob to “a soft drink,” opened a 5,000-square-foot brewpub called the Manhattan Brewing Co. It was located in its namesake borough, in an old electric-company station at Watts and Thompson streets in the not-quite-fashionable-yet Soho neighborhood. Wrigley sold two ales and a lager at $2.50 a mug.

Barely two miles uptown, in West Chelsea, another area of Manhattan awaiting its gentrification, Matthew Reich, a Bronx native and former business executive at Hearst, was putting the finishing touches on what would become the New Amsterdam brewpub. The capacious 110,000-square-foot facility would not only make as much as 30,000 barrels of beer annually, but serve as the backdrop for numerous events, including wedding receptions. Its menu included a 16-ounce sirloin for $15.95.

The two breweries, Manhattan and New Amsterdam, brought brewing back to the nation’s largest city, which had lost its last brewery, Brooklyn’s Rheingold, in 1976. They just couldn’t agree on who was first.

new amsterdam beer

In the mid-1980s, New Amsterdam and Manhattan Beer Co. brought brewing back to New York City. Photo by Tom Acitelli

It was the Big Apple “beer war” of the mid-1980s and it presaged much of what was to come in American brewing—something to keep in mind as New York City Beer Week gets under way.

First, though, let us acknowledge that even being able to discuss a localized beer war in the mid-1980s set New York City apart from the vast majority of towns across the United States. The number of breweries nationwide had dwindled significantly since World War II; the trend was toward fewer breweries, not more; and certainly not more than one in a single city, however large.

As for Manhattan vs. New Amsterdam specifically, the animosity hinged on who was actually brewing in New York and when—a preview of not only the controversy over contract brewing that would soon envelop smaller breweries, but a preview, too, of the craft vs. crafty debate so familiar to the industry today.

Both Manhattan and New Amsterdam contract brewed. That is, they paid other, larger breweries to make their recipes, though each also brewed in-house. In Manhattan’s case, it was with the Lion Brewery in Wilkes-Barre, PA. For New Amsterdam, it was with the F.X. Matt Brewing Co. in Utica, NY.

This allowed New Amsterdam to claim New York parentage on all its beers (as in New York State), a reality that rankled Manhattan. “We were brewing [in the city] first, and Reich copied everything we did,” one of Wrigley’s partners told New York magazine in early 1987.

The copycat claim seemed especially thin in New Amsterdam’s case: Reich had contracted with F.X. Matt way back in 1982, well before the West Chelsea brewpub, the New Amsterdam brand hitting the streets of Gotham that fall. “We didn’t deceive anybody,” Reich told New York. “The label said, ‘Made in New York,’ and we always intended to open in the city.”

And on it went for years, New Amsterdam and Manhattan circling each other warily, often in the media, a development that itself was unusual: Much ink then might be spilled about wine, but not beer—New York, the New York Times and the New York Post all had regular wine critics; none, as now, employed regular beer critics.

In the end, the New York beer war turned out to be immensely beneficial to smaller-scale brewers nationwide. Reich in particular got consumers thinking of beers made with traditional ingredients as something to savor, akin to wine in its worthiness of serious assessment. “It’s the beer to have,” Reich would say of New Amsterdam lager, “if you’re having one. With dinner.” (A conscious spin on the Schaefer’s tag, “Schaefer is the one beer to have when you’re having more than one.”) More generally, the breweries and their feud spilled smaller-batch beer into the media in the media’s capital, whetting the curiosity of untold numbers.

Alas, neither Manhattan nor New Amsterdam survived much beyond the 1980s. The costs of doing business proved too formidable as did keeping up with the growth in demand for these once-novel beers. Such challenges, of course, would also be familiar to the industry today.

Read more Acitelli on History posts.

Tom Acitelli is the author of  The Audacity of Hops: The History of America’s Craft Beer Revolution. Reach him on Twitter @tomacitelli.

4 Comments
  • Terri Allan says:
    February 20, 2015 at 4:32 pm

    Great retrospective Tom. I remember Richard and Matthew well, as my tenure as a beer journalist dates back to those early ’80s days. While both breweries no doubt suffered from the cost of doing business in NYC, they also struggled to compete against powerful national brewers. It’s amazing how things can change in just 30 years.

    Reply
  • Gary Gillman says:
    April 13, 2015 at 4:08 pm

    Good retrospective and these products were important in the general history of craft brewing’s revival but in my opinion, the beers were never that good. I visited Manhattan Brewing Company numerous times and always thought the beers were just adequate, not comparable to England’s best of the genre. The emphasis on cask-conditioning was useful though to re-familiarize Americans with the concept. It’s interesting to compare these beers, New Amsterdam’s too, with, say Sierra Nevada’s and Anchor’s – no comparison, in my opinion again and this is a major reason SN, also Anderson Valley and other long-lived craft operations, survived to this day.

    Gary Gillman

    Reply
    • Prof. LuskusDelph says:
      December 14, 2016 at 11:55 am

      I respectfully disagree with your assessment, Gary. The lagers produced at New Amsterdam’s short lived 11th Ave brewery/restaurant were well made and quite flavorful, as were the ales produced at Manhatten Brewery’s Soho location (most particularly when mark Witty was the head brewer…the quality definitely dipped dramatically when Witty left the operation).
      Another short lived but stellar brewery that NYC briefly saw in the sophmore days of the new beer revolution however was Zip City, which was making some very authentically German tasting lagers.
      In addition to the fact that doing business in NYC is famously expensive, I think a big part of the problem for these three great breweries is that they were all a bit ahead of their time (which arguably, can sometimes be worse than being behind the times),
      Frankly, I’d prefer _any_ of the brews from the three above named brewers than most of what is being made by today’s new wave of smaller “craft” players (many of which, sadly, exhibit a lack of any real craft in their products),

      Reply
  • Mark sofia says:
    August 30, 2018 at 11:56 am

    I loved the new Amsterdam brewery would make the trip from Jersey every weekend. Sometimes twice. The ALE fantastic. Wish I could find a beer or ale as good. I so miss it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow @allaboutbeer

Beer in your inbox

More Like This

  • Beervana Podcast, Episode 42: Summer Hot Takes
  • Amber Ale
  • The Backstory on Montana’s Oldest Brewery

Most Popular

  • A-B InBev Lays Off Employees as Part of New Sales Structure for The High End
  • Heineken Redesigns Bottle For U.S. Market

The Magazine

  • Advertise with Us
  • Subscribe
  • Give a Gift
  • Staff
  • Subscriber Services
  • Retailer Services

Learn Beer

  • Reviews
  • Back Issues
  • Articles
  • Writer Guidelines
  • Internship Program

Events

  • World Beer Festival
  • Craft Beer Events
  • News

All About Beer

  • P.O. Box 110346
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • CONTACT